Development
Connection resilience and server load
When developing client applications, be sure to consider the relevant best practices for connection resilience and managing server load.
Consider more keys and smaller values
Azure Cache for Redis works best with smaller values. To spread the data over multiple keys, consider dividing bigger chunks of data in to smaller chunks. For more information on ideal value size, see this article.
Large request or response size
A large request/response can cause timeouts. As an example, suppose your timeout value configured on your client is 1 second. Your application requests two keys (for example, 'A' and 'B') at the same time (using the same physical network connection). Most clients support request pipelining, where both requests 'A' and 'B' are sent one after the other without waiting for their responses. The server sends the responses back in the same order. If response 'A' is large, it can eat up most of the timeout for later requests.
In the following example, request 'A' and 'B' are sent quickly to the server. The server starts sending responses 'A' and 'B' quickly. Because of data transfer times, response 'B' must wait behind response 'A' times out even though the server responded quickly.
|-------- 1 Second Timeout (A)----------|
|-Request A-|
|-------- 1 Second Timeout (B) ----------|
|-Request B-|
|- Read Response A --------|
|- Read Response B-| (**TIMEOUT**)
This request/response is a difficult one to measure. You could instrument your client code to track large requests and responses.
Resolutions for large response sizes are varied but include:
- Optimize your application for a large number of small values, rather than a few large values.
- The preferred solution is to break up your data into related smaller values.
- See the post What is the ideal value size range for redis? Is 100 KB too large? for details on why smaller values are recommended.
- Increase the size of your virtual machine (VM) to get higher bandwidth capabilities
- More bandwidth on your client or server VM can reduce data transfer times for larger responses.
- Compare your current network usage on both machines to the limits of your current VM size. More bandwidth on only the server or only on the client might not be enough.
- Increase the number of connection objects your application uses.
- Use a round-robin approach to make requests over different connection objects.
Key distribution
If you're planning to use Redis clustering, first read Redis Clustering Best Practices with Keys.
Use pipelining
Try to choose a Redis client that supports Redis pipelining. Pipelining helps make efficient use of the network and get the best throughput possible.
Avoid expensive operations
Some Redis operations, like the KEYS command, are expensive and should be avoided. For some considerations around long running commands, see long-running commands.
Choose an appropriate tier
Use Standard, Premium, Enterprise, or Enterprise Flash tiers for production systems. Don't use the Basic tier in production. The Basic tier is a single node system with no data replication and no SLA. Also, use at least a C1 cache. C0 caches are only meant for simple dev/test scenarios because:
- they share a CPU core
- use little memory
- are prone to noisy neighbor issues
We recommend performance testing to choose the right tier and validate connection settings. For more information, see Performance testing.
Client in same region as cache
Locate your cache instance and your application in the same region. Connecting to a cache in a different region can significantly increase latency and reduce reliability.
While you can connect from outside of Azure, it isn't recommended, especially when using Redis as a cache. If you're using Redis server as just a key/value store, latency might not be the primary concern.
Rely on hostname not public IP address
The public IP address assigned to your cache can change as a result of a scale operation or backend improvement. We recommend relying on the hostname instead of an explicit public IP address. Here are the recommended forms for the various tiers:
Tier | Form |
---|---|
Basic, Standard, Premium | <cachename>.redis.cache.windows.net |
Enterprise, Enterprise Flash | <DNS name>.<Azure region>.redisenterprise.cache.azure.net. |
Choose an appropriate Redis version
The default version of Redis that is used when creating a cache can change over time. Azure Cache for Redis might adopt a new version when a new version of open-source Redis is released. If you need a specific version of Redis for your application, we recommend choosing the Redis version explicitly when you create the cache.
Specific guidance for the Enterprise tiers
Because the Enterprise and Enterprise Flash tiers are built on Redis Enterprise rather than open-source Redis, there are some differences in development best practices. For more information, see Best Practices for the Enterprise and Enterprise Flash tiers.
Use TLS encryption
Azure Cache for Redis requires TLS encrypted communications by default. TLS versions 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 are currently supported. However, TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are on a path to deprecation industry-wide, so use TLS 1.2 if at all possible.
If your client library or tool doesn't support TLS, then enabling unencrypted connections is possible through the Azure portal or management APIs. In cases where encrypted connections aren't possible, we recommend placing your cache and client application into a virtual network. For more information about which ports are used in the virtual network cache scenario, see this table.
Azure TLS Certificate Change
Microsoft is updating Azure services to use TLS server certificates from a different set of Certificate Authorities (CAs). This change is rolled out in phases from August 13, 2020 to October 26, 2020 (estimated). Azure is making this change because the current CA certificates don't one of the CA/Browser Forum Baseline requirements. The problem was reported on July 1, 2020 and applies to multiple popular Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) providers worldwide. Most TLS certificates used by Azure services today come from the Baltimore CyberTrust Root PKI. The Azure Cache for Redis service continues to be chained to the Baltimore CyberTrust Root. Its TLS server certificates, however, will be issued by new Intermediate Certificate Authorities (ICAs) starting on October 12, 2020.
Note
This change is limited to services in public Azure regions. It excludes sovereign (e.g., China) or government clouds.
Does this change affect me?
Most Azure Cache for Redis customers aren't affected by the change. Your application might be affected if it explicitly specifies a list of acceptable certificates, a practice known as certificate pinning. If it's pinned to an intermediate or leaf certificate instead of the Baltimore CyberTrust Root, you should take immediate actions to change the certificate configuration.
Azure Cache for Redis doesn't support OCSP stapling.
The following table provides information about the certificates that are being rolled. Depending on which certificate your application uses, you might need to update it to prevent loss of connectivity to your Azure Cache for Redis instance.
CA Type | Current | Post Rolling (Oct 12, 2020) | Action |
---|---|---|---|
Root | Thumbprint: d4de20d05e66fc53fe1a50882c78db2852cae474 Expiration: Monday, May 12, 2025, 4:59:00 PM Subject Name: CN = Baltimore CyberTrust Root OU = CyberTrust O = Baltimore C = IE |
Not changing | None |
Intermediates | Thumbprints: CN = Microsoft IT TLS CA 1 Thumbprint: 417e225037fbfaa4f95761d5ae729e1aea7e3a42 CN = Microsoft IT TLS CA 2 Thumbprint: 54d9d20239080c32316ed9ff980a48988f4adf2d CN = Microsoft IT TLS CA 4 Thumbprint: 8a38755d0996823fe8fa3116a277ce446eac4e99 CN = Microsoft IT TLS CA 5 Thumbprint: Ad898ac73df333eb60ac1f5fc6c4b2219ddb79b7 Expiration: Friday, May 20, 2024 5:52:38 AM Subject Name: OU = Microsoft IT O = Microsoft Corporation L = Redmond S = Washington C = US |
Thumbprints: CN = Microsoft RSA TLS CA 01 Thumbprint: 703d7a8f0ebf55aaa59f98eaf4a206004eb2516a CN = Microsoft RSA TLS CA 02 Thumbprint: b0c2d2d13cdd56cdaa6ab6e2c04440be4a429c75 Expiration: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 12:00:00 AM; Subject Name: O = Microsoft Corporation C = US |
Required |
What actions should I take?
If your application uses the operating system certificate store or pins the Baltimore root among others, no action is needed.
If your application pins any intermediate or leaf TLS certificate, we recommend you pin the following roots:
Certificate | Thumbprint |
---|---|
Baltimore Root CA | d4de20d05e66fc53fe1a50882c78db2852cae474 |
Microsoft RSA Root Certificate Authority 2017 | 73a5e64a3bff8316ff0edccc618a906e4eae4d74 |
Digicert Global Root G2 | df3c24f9bfd666761b268073fe06d1cc8d4f82a4 |
Tip
Both the intermediate and leaf certificates are expected to change frequently. We recommend not to take a dependency on them. Instead pin your application to a root certificate since it rolls less frequently.
To continue to pin intermediate certificates, add the following to the pinned intermediate certificates list, which includes few more to minimize future changes:
Common name of the CA | Thumbprint |
---|---|
Microsoft RSA TLS CA 01 | 703d7a8f0ebf55aaa59f98eaf4a206004eb2516a |
Microsoft RSA TLS CA 02 | b0c2d2d13cdd56cdaa6ab6e2c04440be4a429c75 |
Microsoft Azure TLS Issuing CA 01 | 2f2877c5d778c31e0f29c7e371df5471bd673173 |
Microsoft Azure TLS Issuing CA 02 | e7eea674ca718e3befd90858e09f8372ad0ae2aa |
Microsoft Azure TLS Issuing CA 05 | 6c3af02e7f269aa73afd0eff2a88a4a1f04ed1e5 |
Microsoft Azure TLS Issuing CA 06 | 30e01761ab97e59a06b41ef20af6f2de7ef4f7b0 |
If your application validates certificate in code, you need to modify it to recognize the properties --- for example, Issuers, Thumbprint --- of the newly pinned certificates. This extra verification should cover all pinned certificates to be more future-proof.
Client library-specific guidance
For more information, see Client libraries.
Next steps
Feedback
https://aka.ms/ContentUserFeedback.
Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues as the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see:Submit and view feedback for